Agentic Digital Finance = AgenticDfin |
![]() |
| Robotic Process Automation + Artificial Intelligence |
![]() |
|
The Genesis of BofI: |
The AgenticDfin Bank Build Process |
Talk With Evans Ai, Imagine Training Staff This way. ![]() |
Video Presentation - History of Bank Technology |
|
Section A – Define the Project – Management Discussion Framework
1.
Purpose / Focus – At its core, this initiative is about disciplined automation
a.
It can support a
start-up bank, an existing bank, a credit union, or another regulated financial
business.
b.
The project may be
enterprise-wide or focused on one high-value operating area.
c.
Begin by identifying
a specific task, workflow, or decision point that would benefit from automation.
d.
Start with a contained
project outside the most sensitive production workflows if that reduces
execution risk.
i.
Some institutions may
decide to prohibit unsanctioned tools entirely.
ii.
Others may allow
limited use, but only through designated LLMs and approved software tools.
1.
A practical example is
controlled experimentation by development or innovation teams before wider
rollout.
iii.
Look for friction
points that slow work, create rework, or increase customer effort.
iv.
Prioritize
opportunities that improve accuracy, trust, consistency, and scale.
2.
C-Suite leadership should initiate and oversee the process
a.
First determine what,
if anything, the institution’s core processor or primary banking platform
already offers.
i.
Core processors often
provide stronger built-in security, integration support, and regulatory
alignment than standalone tools.
b.
Target areas where
automation can produce measurable value quickly.
i.
Accounting and finance
operations
1.
Microsoft has already
embedded AI capabilities across Microsoft 365 productivity workflows.
ii.
Loan processing and
preparation for underwriting
iii.
Loan review processes
that can become more thorough, repeatable, and auditable
iv.
Customer service
functions across the institution
1.
Build consistency in
how questions are answered and requests are routed.
2.
Allow AI to operate
only within pre-approved answers, policies, and escalation paths.
3.
Establish the vision and the transformational business case
a.
The primary benefit is
time saved for employees and faster response for customers.
i.
That time can support
lower operating cost, stronger controls, or additional business development
capacity.
ii.
In a growth strategy,
the same staff base may be able to serve more customers and products.
1.
The best outcome is
not just savings, but a stronger and more scalable business.
b.
Best case: leadership
sees a path to materially improve efficiency, responsiveness, and quality.
c.
Worst case: the
initiative is driven only by fear of missing out rather than a grounded
operating need.
d.
Define specific
targets, with efficiency as a starting point but not the only goal.
i.
What customer
problems will this solve?
ii.
What internal
operating problems will it solve?
iii.
What should be ranked
first, second, and third for execution?
1.
Re-rank priorities as
more is learned about cost, risk, data quality, and adoption.
iv.
The strategy should
clearly support:
1.
Growth
2.
Efficiency
3.
Accuracy
4.
Security
v.
Risk reduction
through better controls, fewer manual errors, and clearer accountability
vi.
Higher service
quality in a digital finance environment where response speed and consistency
matter
e.
Oversight for AI use in a regulated financial setting
i.
Identify regulatory
considerations, policy implications, and likely examiner questions early.
ii.
Confirm whether the
project architect and leadership team have the right experience.
1.
If not, determine how
those gaps will be covered through internal experts, advisors, or implementation
partners.
f.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology – important for controlled
enterprise use
i.
Consider RAG to
improve protection of proprietary information and to ground responses in
approved enterprise content.
1.
Staff can then work
with general knowledge, a selected LLM, and approved internal data under
controlled access rules.
ii.
Restrict staff access
where appropriate.
1.
General policy and
procedure access
2.
Approved customer
letters, templates, and departmental knowledge bases
a.
Access should be
controlled by department, role, and business need.
iii.
Protect proprietary
information through data classification, role-based permissions, logging, and
vendor controls.
iv.
Evaluate and price
multiple providers before making a platform decision.
1.
IBM
2.
Microsoft Azure
3.
Amazon Web Services
(AWS)
v.
Decide which LLM or
model family will be used, under what conditions, and for which business tasks.
vi.
Three major drivers of
this shift are already clear:
vii.
AI must be trustworthy
at scale—hallucinations and black-box outputs continue to slow adoption in
regulated environments.
viii.
Unstructured data is
now mission-critical because much enterprise knowledge sits in PDFs, recordings,
messages, and other non-tabular formats.
|
|
Section B – Who, What, and When
1.
Build governance and executive sponsorship
a.
Adapt the governance
model to the size, complexity, and transaction volume of the institution.
i.
In addition to a lead
project architect, sub-architects or workstream leaders may be needed.
b.
The project architect
should be accountable for overall design, coordination, and delivery.
i.
Key participants
usually include operations, deployment, business owners, and implementation team
members.
a.
Risk
b.
Compliance
c.
Technology
2.
Define decision rights
a.
Approval processes
should be documented and consistently followed.
b.
Accountability for
risk, quality, and outcomes must be explicit.
3.
Personal agent
a.
Define the intended
outcomes for any personal agent or assistant capability.
b.
Identify friction
points the agent is meant to reduce.
c.
Set a high bar for
accuracy.
i.
In regulated finance,
near-perfect reliability matters because errors can create customer, compliance,
and reputational risk.
d.
Design for trust and
scale from the beginning.
e.
Clarify whether the
agent is employee-facing, customer-facing, or limited to internal productivity
use.
4.
Define scope, objectives, and success metrics
5.
Set measurable goals from the beginning, such as:
a.
Automate clearly
defined steps rather than vague ambitions.
b.
Improve onboarding,
servicing, lending, or finance operations.
c.
Reduce cost,
turnaround time, and manual effort.
d.
Increase accuracy,
control, and customer satisfaction.
e.
Remove friction for
staff and customers.
6.
Identify and prioritize the first wave of use cases based on value, risk, data
readiness, and implementation speed. |
|
Section C – Build Strategy
1.
Review
a.
Review the end-to-end
finance and operating workflow.
i.
Break the bank into
business areas and sub-areas so opportunities can be assessed systematically.
b.
Identify where AI and
automation can deliver the highest value.
c.
Prioritize use cases
based on:
i.
Impact
ii.
Feasibility
iii.
Data availability and
data quality
iv.
Compliance and
operational risk
v.
Speed to value
2.
Design the target solution and controls
a.
Determine whether the
initiative has the right data sources, data quality, integrations, security
controls, talent, budget, and technology foundation to support implementation
and scale.
3.
Assess data, systems, and resource readiness
a.
Define how AI, rules,
workflow, human review, and existing systems will work together.
b.
Build in controls for
transparency, validation, model monitoring, privacy, security, and auditability
from the start.
c.
Map business rules,
exception handling, and escalation paths.
d.
Define
human-in-the-loop checkpoints for high-risk decisions, customer-impacting
outputs, and exceptions.
e.
Set standards for
explainability, evidence retention, and compliance documentation.
4.
Launch a pilot and measure results
a.
Start with a
contained use case that has clear boundaries, manageable risk, and measurable
outcomes.
b.
Validate performance
against baseline metrics.
c.
Measure user adoption
and workflow fit.
d.
Confirm compliance
readiness before broader rollout.
e.
Document operational
impact, lessons learned, and go/no-go criteria for scaling.
5.
Continuously govern
a.
After the pilot,
expand through a repeatable delivery model. Continue improving models,
workflows, controls, and governance so the digital finance program remains
effective, safe, compliant, and aligned with business goals.
b.
Challenge what was
done. |
|
Section D – Cybersecurity, Audit, and Regulatory
1.
Cybersecurity
a.
Cybersecurity is
mandatory and should be designed into the program from the beginning, not added
later.
b.
Focus on identity,
access control, data protection, vendor risk, monitoring, incident response, and
logging.
2.
Audit
a.
Expect evolving audit
expectations, including stronger evidence requirements for controls, outputs,
approvals, and model oversight.
3.
Regulatory
a.
Expect additional
rules, guidance, and examiner focus over time as AI use expands in financial
services.
b.
Maintain documentation
that shows how the institution manages risk, validates outputs, and protects
customers.
4.
Testing
a.
Testing should be
guided by executive leadership, with the CFO and other senior stakeholders
helping define acceptable performance, control evidence, and rollout criteria. |



